The whole of Dudley Square is a gallimaufry of different types of lamps. Washington and Warren have acorns. Streets off of it have George Jetsons or Flat-tops. Dudley Station has its own giant dual, square, flat faced lamps. What's up with that?
![]() |
| "George Jetson" lamps on Marvin St. and "acorns" in front of Central Elder Services on Washington |
![]() | ||||||||
| "Flat face" lamps in Dudley Station, acorn lamps on Washington |
Maybe the mix is an unintentional nod to some kind of modern historical authenticity and each type of street light speaks to a different era of development and construction or financial or environmental constraint. Or maybe the hodge-podge of street lights is a symbol of an era of neglect and sloppiness where things were done in the Square with an "it's Roxbury, who cares?" attitude. Maybe there simply has been no cohesive overarching aesthetic vision of what Dudley might best look like.
The Roxbury Strategic Master Plan, published in 2004, a "community-based Plan (that) is the product of a three-year partnership with community members, resident groups and city and elected officials," according to the preface by Mayor Menino, has all kinds of recommendations on how things should be done in Roxbury. I think we are the only neighborhood to have such a "plan".
Though I found no mention in the 119 page document specifically of street lights, on page 75, the RSMP does state that "Rigorous development standards and design guidelines are critical to ensure high quality development desired by the Roxbury community." Just sayin'.



"Rigorous development standards and design guidelines are critical to ensure high quality development desired by the Roxbury community."
ReplyDeleteare we talking about lights down Dudley?
What about the major issues, open drinking, loitering, drug use, drug sales, prostitution all 100 yards away from the police station... by the way it doesnt look good to me.. it looks like money that could have been better spent on something else and also its quick construction shows that when the city wants to do something it gets done... too bad what they want to do usually only benefits the city and not the people.